Paciorek v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. The court DISMISSES this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 6/3/24. (dle)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
KENNETH MICHAEL PACIOREK,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF
LATTER-DAY SAINTS,
Defendant.
Case No. 2:23-cv-00904-JNP-DBP
Judge Jill N. Parrish
Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead issued a Report and Recommendation that the court
dismiss the plaintiff’s action with prejudice for failure to comply with the court’s orders. Judge
Pead notified the plaintiff that a failure to file a timely objection to the recommendation could
waive any objections to it. No objection was filed within the allotted time.
Because no party objected to the Report and Recommendation, any argument that it was in
error has been waived. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th
Cir. 1996). The court will decline to apply the waiver rule only if “the interests of justice so
dictate.” Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991). In determining whether the
interests of justice require an exception to the waiver rule, the Tenth Circuit has “considered factors
such as ‘a pro se litigant’s effort to comply, the force and plausibility of the explanation for his
failure to comply, and the importance of the issues raised.’” Duffield v. Jackson, 545 F.3d 1234,
1238 (10th Cir. 2008). In this case, there is no indication that the interests of justice require it to
deviate from the waiver rule. Thus, the court finds that all objections are waived and ADOPTS IN
FULL the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 15, is ADOPTED IN FULL.
2. The court DISMISSES this action with prejudice.
DATED June 3, 2024.
BY THE COURT:
______________________________________
JILL N. PARRISH
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?