Barron v. Pallito et al

Filing 48

ORDER Affirming, Approving and Adopting 44 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dft Weischedel's 38 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Pltf shall be allowed 20 days to amend his claims against Dr. Weischedel. Dft Hatcher's 33 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. This matter is returned to Magistrate Judge John M. Conroy for further proceedings. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 5/28/2010. (kak)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT DAVID WAYNE BARRON, : : Plaintiff : : v. : : ANDREW PALLITO, PRISON HEALTH : SERVICES, INC., DELORES : BURROUGHS-BIRON, BALLARD, : GARRY WEISCHEDEL, RANDY PORTER,: THERESA STONE, KEVIN JENKINS, : JODY BERRIER, MENTAL HEALTH : MANAGEMENT, INC., : : Defendants : ORDER The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed May 4, 2010. (Paper 44.) After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendant Weischedel's motion to dismiss (Paper 38) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall be allowed 20 days to amend his claims against Dr. Weischedel to comply with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court notes Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint on May 19, 2010 (Paper 46) in response to an earlier Order of the Court. (Paper 43.) Defendant Mark Hatcher's motion to dismiss (Paper 33) is DENIED as moot. Defendant Hatcher was dismissed from the case and terminated as a party pursuant to the Court's Order filed April 2, 2010. (Paper 43.) File No. 1:09-CV-209 This matter is returned to Magistrate Judge John M. Conroy for further proceedings. It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). SO ORDERED. Dated at Brattleboro, in the District of Vermont, this 28th day of May, 2010. /s/ J. Garvan Murtha Honorable J. Garvan Murtha Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?