Rheaume v. Hofmann et al

Filing 30

ORDER Affirming, Approving, and Adopting 26 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. 29 Pltf's Request for Reconsideration is DENIED. 17 Dft's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED without prejudice. It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 7/19/2011. (kak)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
DISTRICT OF VERMONT
ALLEN RHEAUME,
Plaintiff
v.
ROBERT HOFMANN,
SANDRA OLBERG,
TAMMY KENNISON,
and JERRI BROUILLETTE,
Defendants

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

File No. 1:10-cv-318-jgm

ORDER
The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed June 6, 2011.
(Doc. 26.) After de novo review and over objection, the Report and Recommendation is
AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) is GRANTED, and this case is
DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration (Doc. 29) of the
Magistrate Judge’s Order denying his motion to stay the proceedings (Doc. 10) is
DENIED.
It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order
would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. See 28
U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
SO ORDERED.
Dated at Brattleboro, in the District of Vermont, this 19th day of July, 2011.
/s/ J. Garvan Murtha
Honorable J. Garvan Murtha
United States District Judge