Cote v. Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
Filing
49
ORDER granting 48 Motion Allocate Damages. Pltf's damages, if any, recovered in a pretrial settlement shall be allocated 25% to economic damages and 75% to non-economic damages. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 7/11/2016. (kak)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
DISTRICT OF VERMONT
ROGER COTE,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
ROBERT BOSCH TOOL CORPORATION, :
:
Defendant.
:
_____________________________________ :
Case No. 1:14-cv-202-jgm
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALLOCATE DAMAGES
(Doc. 48)
In this diversity action commenced in September 2014, Plaintiff Roger Cote asserts product
liability claims against Defendant Robert Bosch Tool Corporation (“Bosch”) alleging design defects
in a benchtop table saw. (Doc. 1.) Following summary judgment, Cote’s strict liability and
negligence claims remain. See Doc. 41. Cote now moves the Court to allocate damages for
purposes of facilitating settlement. (Doc. 48.) Bosch does not oppose the motion. Id.
Based upon the parties’ agreement, and having reviewed the materials submitted, the Court
finds that allocating 25% of Cote’s damages to economic damages is fair and reasonable. See
Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Estate of Keenan, 937 A.2d 630, 632-33 (Vt. 2007) (noting to be fair
and reasonable, a damages award must be apportioned according to the ratio of overall economic
damages to overall non-economic damages). Accordingly, Cote’s damages, if any, recovered in a
pretrial settlement shall be allocated 25% to economic damages and 75% to non-economic damages.
SO ORDERED.
Dated at Brattleboro, in the District of Vermont, this 11th day of July, 2016.
/s/ J. Garvan Murtha
Hon. J. Garvan Murtha
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?