Velazquez v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION : 4 complaint is DISMISSED. Plaintiff is allowed 30 days in which to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 4/4/2011. (law)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT Jose Luis Velazquez, Plaintiff, v. Vermont Department of Corrections, Southern State Correctional Facility, Defendants. : : : : File No. 2:11 CV 60 : : : : : ORDER The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed March 15, 2011. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report. A district judge must make a de novo determination of those portions of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation to which an objection is made. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); Perez-Rubio v. Wyckoff, 718 F.Supp. 217, 227 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). The district judge may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Id. It is hereby ordered that the complaint in this case be DISMISSED. It is further ordered that Plaintiff be allowed thirty (30) days in which to file an amended complaint. Failure to comply with this deadline should result in the dismissal of his complaint with prejudice. Dated at Burlington, in the District of Vermont, this 4th day of April, 2011. /s/ William K. Sessions III William K. Sessions III District Court Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?