Vasquez v. State of California et al

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION this case is transferred to the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1406. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 10/15/2012. (law)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT DAVID MARTINEZ, a/k/a ROBERT VASQUEZ, Plaintiff, : : : : v. : Docket No. 2:12-CV-179 : STATE OF CALIFORNIA, : STEPHEN DREW, : STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT : OF CORRECTIONS, : Defendants. : ORDER The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed August 14, 2012. Plaintiff’s objections were filed on September 14, 2012, October, 1, 5, 9, and 10, 2012. A district judge must make a de novo determination of those portions of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation to which an objection is made. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); Perez-Rubio v. Wyckoff, 718 F.Supp. 217, 227 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). The district judge may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Id. After careful review of the file, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the objections, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report. It is hereby ORDERED that this case be TRANSFERRRED pursuant to 28 U.S.C., §1406 to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Dated at Burlington, in the District of Vermont, this 15th day of October, 2012. /s/ William K. Sessions III William K. Sessions III District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?