Guzman v. Jaddou
Filing
4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by District Judge Geoffrey W. Crawford on 3/6/2025. (sjl)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Sandra Guzman,
Plaintiff,
V.
Director, United States Citizenship and
Immigration Services, 1
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
u.J. U!STHICT COURT
DISTRICT OF VERMOHT
FILED
MttAR-6 AHII: 28
C~Jt?
BY_D_E_PU-t""'-4o'l!~..-L-ER_K_
Case No. 2:24-cv-1447
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
A review of the docket in this case reveals the following:
1. On December 2, 2024, Plaintiff filed an application for leave to proceed informa
pauperis ("IFP"), or without paying the filing fee, to commence an action against the
Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.
2. On January 31, 2025, the court denied the IFP Application without prejudice.
Plaintiff was provided the opportunity to pay the filing fee, or to refile the
Application with an affidavit or declaration demonstrating her inability to pay, on or
before February 28, 2025. Plaintiff was warned that if she failed to do so, the case
would be dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. 3 at 3.)
3. No further filings have been received as of the date of this Order.
Because Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or to refile an IFP application on or before
February 28, 2025, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court certifies that
any appeal would not be taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3).
SO ORDERED.
Dated at Burlington, in the District of Vermont, this 6th day of March, 2025.
Isl Geoffrey W. Crawford
District Judge
United States District Court
1
On January 31, 2025, Andrew J. Davidson was appointed Acting Director of USCIS and is
automatically substituted as the defendant in this action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 25( d).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?