Tafas v. Dudas et al

Filing 233

ORDER Upon reviewing the Local Civil Rule 7.1 Financial Disclosures filed and the only one that gives me pause is filed by Public Patent Foundation 115 that indicates that AARP states that there is nothing to report under Local Civil 7.1(A)(l)(a) and (b). If this is the American Association of Retired Persons, my wife is a member of that group. Please advise the Court if that in fact is the group involved in the case by Tuesday, January 22,2008. For future reference, courtesy copies of pleadings filed should be sent to chambers. Signed by Judge James C. Cacheris on 1/11/08. (klau, )

Download PDF
Tafas v. Dudas et al Doc. 233 Case 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ Document 233 Filed 01/11/2008 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division TRIANTAFYLLOS TAFAS Plaintiffs, v. JON W. DUDAS, et al. Defendants. CONSOLIDATED WITH SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, Plaintiff, ) ) v. JON W. DUDAS, et al. )l:07cvl008(JCC/TRJ) ) Defendants. ) Upon reviewing the Local Civil Rule 7.1 Financial Disclosures filed and the only one that gives me pause is filed by Public Patent Foundation [115] that indicates that AARP states that there is nothing to report under Local Civil 7.1(A)(l)(a) and (b). If this is the American Association of Retired Persons, my wife is a member of that group. Please advise the Court if that in fact is the group involved in the case by Tuesday, January 22,2008. For future reference, courtesy copies of pleadings filed should be sent to chambers. /s/ Alexandria, VA January 11,2008 United States District Judge James C. Cacheris Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?