Tafas v. Dudas et al
Filing
233
ORDER Upon reviewing the Local Civil Rule 7.1 Financial Disclosures filed and the only one that gives me pause is filed by Public Patent Foundation 115 that indicates that AARP states that there is nothing to report under Local Civil 7.1(A)(l)(a) and (b). If this is the American Association of Retired Persons, my wife is a member of that group. Please advise the Court if that in fact is the group involved in the case by Tuesday, January 22,2008. For future reference, courtesy copies of pleadings filed should be sent to chambers. Signed by Judge James C. Cacheris on 1/11/08. (klau, )
Tafas v. Dudas et al
Doc. 233
Case 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ
Document 233
Filed 01/11/2008
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division
TRIANTAFYLLOS TAFAS
Plaintiffs,
v.
JON W. DUDAS, et al.
Defendants.
CONSOLIDATED WITH
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
JON W. DUDAS, et al.
)l:07cvl008(JCC/TRJ)
)
Defendants.
)
Upon reviewing the Local Civil Rule 7.1 Financial Disclosures filed and the only one that
gives me pause is filed by Public Patent Foundation [115] that indicates that AARP states that there
is nothing to report under Local Civil 7.1(A)(l)(a) and (b). If this is the American Association of
Retired Persons, my wife is a member of that group. Please advise the Court if that in fact is the
group involved in the case by Tuesday, January 22,2008.
For future reference, courtesy copies of pleadings filed should be sent to chambers.
/s/
Alexandria, VA
January 11,2008
United States District Judge
James C. Cacheris
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?