Tafas v. Dudas et al
Filing
256
AGREED ORDER that the page-limit for each party's brief in opposition to another party's motion for summary judgment is enlarged from 40 pages to 45 pages. Signed by Judge James C. Cacheris on 1/23/08. (klau, )
Tafas v. Dudas et al
Doc. 256
Case 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ
Document 256
Filed 01/23/2008
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
TRIANTAFYLLOS TAFAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
l:07cv846(JCC/TRJ)
JON W. DUDAS,eta!.,
Defendants.
CONSOLIDATED WITH
SMITH KLINE BEECHAM
CORPORATION,
d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
l:07cvl008(JCC/TRJ)
JON W. DUDAS, ct at,
Defendants.
AGREED ORDER
Upon consideration of the agreement of the parlies, as evidenced by the endorsements of
counsel below, and recognizing the large number of claims at issue in these consolidated cases, it
is hereby
ORDERED that the page-limit lor each parly's brief in opposition to another party's
motion for summary judgment is enlarged from 40 pages to 45 pages.
Entered this Alexandria. Virginia _ day of January 2008
Is!
W. QaSftS&r&nior District Judae
nited States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ
Document 256
Filed 01/23/2008
Page 2 of 2
0
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?