Tafas v. Dudas et al

Filing 38

Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Biotechnology Industry Organization. (Miller, Randall)

Download PDF
Tafas v. Dudas et al Doc. 38 Case 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ Document 38 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division TRIANTAFYLLOS TAFAS, Plaintiff, v. JON W. DUDAS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:07cv846 (JCC/TRJ) CONSOLIDATED WITH SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JON W. DUDAS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:07cv1008 (JCC/TRJ) LOCAL CIVIL RULE 7.1 FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE The Biotechnology Industry Organization ("BIO") is a 501(c)(6) non-profit organization dedicated to providing advocacy and business development support to the biotechnology industry. The organization's revenue sources include membership dues, sponsorship and registration income from events, advertising in BIO publications and on the bio.org website, income from various services, and interest and investment income. BIO has no parent or subsidiary entities that have issued stock or debt securities to the public, and no publicly held entity (corporate or otherwise) owns a higher than 10% equity stake in BIO (whether in the form Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ Document 38 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 2 of 4 of stock or debt securities). Many of BIO's members, however, have issued securities to the public. A list of BIO's more than 1,100 members, affiliates, and associate organizations can be found at www.bio.org. Respectfully submitted, ARNOLD & PORTER LLP By: /s/ Randall K. Miller VA Bar #70672 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Biotechnology Industry Organization 1600 Tysons Boulevard Suite 900 McLean, VA 22102 Telephone: (703) 720-7030 Facsimile: (703) 720-7399 Randall.Miller@aporter.com Of Counsel for Amicus Curiae Biotechnology Industry Organization: Ronald A. Schechter David R. Marsh Matthew M. Shultz ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 555 12th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: (202) 942-5000 Facsimile: (202) 942-5999 ATTORNEYS FOR AMICUS CURIAE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ORGANIZATION October 29, 2007 Case 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ Document 38 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 3 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 29th day of October 2007, I caused a copy of the foregoing Financial Disclosure to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notification of such filing to the following: Elizabeth M. Locke Kirkland & Ellis LLP 655 15th Street, NW - Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20005 Email: elocke@kirkland.com and Craig C. Reilly Richard McGettigan Reilly & West PC 1725 Duke Street - Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314 Email: craig.reilly@rmrwlaw.com Counsel for GSK Plaintiffs Joseph Dale Wilson, III Kelley Drye & Warren LLP Washington Harbour 3050 K Street NW -- Suite 400 Washington, DC 20007 Email: jwilson@kelleydrye.com Counsel for Plaintiff Tafas Lauren A. Wetzler United States Attorney's Office 2100 Jamison Ave. Alexandria, VA 22314 Email: lauren.wetzler@usdoj.gov Counsel for Defendants Thomas J. O'Brien Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 1111 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20004 Email: to'brien@morganlewis.com Counsel for Putative Amicus American Intellectual Property Lawyers Association Case 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ Document 38 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 4 of 4 Dawn-Marie Bey Kilpatrick Stockton LLP 700 13th Street, NW Suite 800 Washington, DC 20005 Counsel for Putative Amicus Hexas, LLC, The Roskamp Institute, Tikvah Therapeutics, Inc. James M. Dowd Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP 1455 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20004 Counsel for Putative Amicus Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America /s/ Randall K. Miller VA Bar #70672 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Biotechnology Industry Organization 1600 Tysons Boulevard Suite 900 McLean, VA 22102 Telephone: (703) 720-7030 Facsimile: (703) 720-7399 Randall.Miller@aporter.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?