Al Shimari v. Dugan et al

Filing 118

ORDER of USCA as to 96 Notice of Appeal filed by CACI Premier Technology, Inc, CACI International, Inc, 115 Notice of Cross Appeal filed by Salah Hasan Nusaif Jasim Al-Ejaili, Taha Yaseen Arraq Rashid, Suhail Najim Abdullah Al Shimari, Sa'ad Hamza Hantoosh Al-Zuba'e. The court consolidates Case No. 09-1335 and Case No. 09-2324. The appellant in Case No. 09-1335 shall be considered the appellant for purposes of the consolidated appeals and shall proceed first at briefing and at oral argument. Entry of appearance forms and disclosure statements filed by counsel and parties to the lead case are deemed filed in the secondary case. (nmck, )

Download PDF
Al Shimari v. Dugan et al Doc. 118 FILED: December 2, 2009 UNITED FOR STATES THE COURT OF APPEALS FOURTH CIRCUIT ' NO. 09-1335 (L) DEC-22009 ! Al ItXAi''!;"'!.''. t'..-:>jir»'?A (l:08-cv-00827-GBL-JFA) u.s. c;-vi;:?'.... SUHAIL NAJIM ABDULLAH AL SA'AD SHIMARI; TAHA YASEEN ARRAQ RASHID; HAMZA HANTOOSH AL-ZUBA'E; Plaintiffs - SALAH HASAN NUSAIF JA AL-EJAILI, Appellees v. CACI INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; CACI PREMIER TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellants No. 09-2324 (1:08-CV-00827-GBL-JFA) SUHAIL NAJIM ABDULLAH AL SHIMARI; TAHA YASEEN ARRAQ RASHID; SA'AD HAMZA HANTOOSH AL-ZUBA'E; Plaintiffs v. SALAH HASAN Appellants NUSAIF JA AL-EJAILI, CACI PREMIER TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED; CACI INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendants Appellees Dockets.Justia.com ORDER The 2324. The Court consolidates in Case Case No. No. 09-1335 shall and Case No. be 09the appellant 09-1335 considered appellant proceed for purposes at of the consolidated appeals and at oral argument. and shall of first briefing Entry appearance parties to forms the and disclosure case are statements filed filed by in the counsel and lead deemed secondary case. For the Court--By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?