Boles v. Destination Movers, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. ORDERED that judgment is ENTERED by default in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the total amount of $8,271.50, plus costs as taxed by the Clerk. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ. P. and to place this matter among the ended causes. (See Order For Details). Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 7/6/09. (nhall)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division ELIZABETH ANNE BOLES, Plaintiff, ) ) v# DESTINATION MOVERS, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. l:09cv 19 JUDGMENT ORDER Upon consideration of the June 10,2009 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge designated to conduct a hearing in this matter, no objections having been filed, and based upon an independent de novo review of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Court adopts as its own the findings of fact and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, as set forth in the June 10, 2009 Report and Recommendation.1 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that judgment is ENTERED by default in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the total amount of $8,271.50, plus costs as taxed by the Clerk. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ. P. and to place this matter among the ended causes. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to send a certified copy of this Judgment Order to defendant and all counsel of record. July 6,2009 Alexandria, VA United States Dis/rict Judge T. S. Ellis, III h _ was an inadvertent typographical error. On page 3 of the Report, the Magistrate Judge indicates, inter alia, that plaintiff submitted paperwork to Anthem Claims Management, LLC on July 2, 2009. It is clear from a review of the record that the Magistrate Judge's reference in this instance to 2009, rather than 2008

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?