Rosetta Stone LTD v. Google Inc.
Filing
135
NOTICE of Filing by Google Inc. re 118 Memorandum in Support (Frieden, Jonathan) Modified text on 3/30/2010 re Received under seal copy of Memorandum in Support on 3/30/10 (UNDER SEAL) (klau, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
(Alexandria Division)
ROSETTA STONE LTD.
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09cv736
(GBL / TCB)
v.
GOOGLE INC.
Defendant.
NOTICE OF FILING
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE of the submission, under seal, of a corrected Memorandum in
Support of Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 118) including a “tracked changes” copy. Copies of
both have been provided to opposing counsel.
Respectfully Submitted,
GOOGLE INC.
By counsel
/s/
Jonathan D. Frieden, Esquire (VSB No. 41452)
Stephen A. Cobb, Esquire (VSB No. 75876)
ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, P.C.
9302 Lee Highway, Suite 1100
Fairfax, Virginia 22031
(703) 218-2100
(703) 218-2160 (facsimile)
jonathan.frieden@ofplaw.com
stephen.cobb@ofplaw.com
Margret M. Caruso, Esquire (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
QUINN, EMANUEL, URQUHART, OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560
Redwood Shores, California 94065
(650) 801-5101
(650) 801-5100 (facsimile)
margretcaruso@quinnemanuel.com
Counsel for Defendant Google Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 29th day of March, 2010, I electronically filed the
foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which then sent a notification of
such filing (NEF) to the following:
Warren Thomas Allen, II
SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
1440 New York Ave NW
Washington, DC 20005-2111
202-371-7126
Fax: 202-661-9063
Email: wtallen@skadden.com
Counsel for Plaintiff Rosetta Stone Ltd.
/s/
Jonathan D. Frieden, Esquire (VSB No. 41452)
Stephen A. Cobb, Esquire (VSB No. 75876)
ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, P.C.
9302 Lee Highway, Suite 1100
Fairfax, Virginia 22031
(703) 218-2100
(703) 218-2160 (facsimile)
jonathan.frieden@ofplaw.com
stephen.cobb@ofplaw.com
Counsel for Defendant Google Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?