Rosetta Stone LTD v. Google Inc.

Filing 176

Notice of Hearing Date set for April 23, 2010 re 173 MOTION for Sanctions (Allen, Warren)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ____________________________________ ROSETTA STONE LTD., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) GOOGLE INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) Case No. 1:09-cv-00736 (GBL/TCB) NOTICE OF HEARING ON ROSETTA STONE LTD.’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 23, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, Rosetta Stone Ltd. (“Rosetta Stone”) will move the Court for an order imposing sanctions against Google Inc. This motion for sanctions relates, in part, to Rosetta Stone’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Google’s Motion for Summary Judgment, both of which also are scheduled to be heard on April 23, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, April 16, 2010 Date /s/ Warren T. Allen II (Va. Bar No. 72691) Attorney for Rosetta Stone Ltd. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 1440 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-2111 Telephone: (202) 371-7000 Facsimile: (202) 393-5760 Warren.Allen@skadden.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 16, 2010, I will electronically file the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing (NEF) to the following: Jonathan D. Frieden ODIN, FELDMAN & PETTLEMAN, P.C. 9302 Lee Highway, Suite 1100 Fairfax, VA 22031 jonathan.frieden@ofplaw.com Counsel for Defendant, Google Inc. Respectfully submitted, April 16, 2010 Date /s/ Warren T. Allen II (Va. Bar No. 72691) Attorney for Rosetta Stone Ltd. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 1440 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-2111 Telephone: (202) 371-7000 Facsimile: (202) 393-5760 Warren.Allen@skadden.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?