Rosetta Stone LTD v. Google Inc.

Filing 205

Proposed Voir Dire by Rosetta Stone LTD. (Allen, Warren)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ____________________________________ ROSETTA STONE LTD., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) GOOGLE INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) Civ. Action No. 1:09-cv-00736(GBL/TCB) ROSETTA STONE’S PROPOSED VOIR DIRE In addition to the Court’s standard inquiry, Plaintiff Rosetta Stone Ltd. respectfully requests that prospective jurors be asked the following technology and case-related questions: 1. Have you, or someone close to you, ever worked for, or applied to work for, Google or Rosetta Stone? 2. Have you ever owned stock in either Google or Rosetta Stone? 3. Have you, or someone close to you, ever had any training or experience in computer science, software development, information technology or a related field? 4. Have you, or someone close to you, ever had any training or experience in trademarks, patents, or copyrights, or in any other area of the law? 5. Have you, or someone close to you, ever worked for a company that was involved in a trademark, copyright or patent dispute? 6. Do you have a Gmail account? 7. Do you belong to any social networking sites such as Google’s Orkut, Facebook, MySpace, or Twitter? 8. Do you think that BiTorrent sites or peer to peer file sharing sites, such as eDonkey, Gnutella, Rapidshare or Usenet, should be allowed to provide free downloads of software? 9. Are you a supporter of “open-source” software? 10. Have you, or someone close to you, ever advertised or sold goods through Google? 11. Do you regularly read computer- or technology-oriented magazines? 12. Do you, or anyone in your family or any of your close friends, maintain a weblog, or blog or have a personal website? 13. Have you purchased or used Rosetta Stone language products to learn another language? 14. Have you purchased or used a brand of software other than Rosetta Stone to learn a foreign language? 15. Do you think that companies like Napster that provided free downloads of music should be allowed to do this? 16. Have you ever been involved in negotiating the terms of a legal contract? 17. Have you, or someone close to you, ever been involved in a lawsuit, either as a party or a witness? 18. Have you ever had any experience with, or do you have any connection with, any of the individuals or entities whose names I will now read to you: Google LitiNomics NERA Ocean Tomo Rosetta Stone Tom Adams Edward Blair Jason Calhoun Terri Chen Daniel Dulitz Eric Eichmann Prashant Fuloria Baris Gultekin Rose Hagan Alana Karen Van Leigh Bill Lloyd Corey Louie James Malackowski Nino Ninov Larry Page Nicole Tabatabai Kent Van Liere Michael Wagner Susan Wojcicki Michael Wu 2 Respectfully submitted, April 26, 2010 Of Counsel: Mitchell S. Ettinger (Pro hac vice) Clifford M. Sloan (Pro hac vice) Jennifer L. Spaziano (Pro hac vice) Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP 1440 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-2111 /s/ Warren T. Allen II Virginia Bar Number 72691 Attorney for Plaintiff Rosetta Stone Ltd. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP 1440 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-2111 (202) 371-7000 (202) 393-5760 wtallen@skadden.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 26, 2010 I will electronically file the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will then send a notification of such filing (NEF) to the following: Jonathan D. Frieden ODIN, FELDMAN & PETTLEMAN, P.C. 9302 Lee Highway, Suite 1100 Fairfax, VA 22031 jonathan.frieden@ofplaw.com Counsel for Defendant, Google Inc. April 26, 2010 Date /s/ Warren T. Allen II (Va. Bar No. 72691) Attorney for Rosetta Stone Ltd. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 1440 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-2111 Telephone: (202) 371-7000 Facsimile: (202) 393-5760 Warren.Allen@skadden.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?