Rosetta Stone LTD v. Google Inc.

Filing 260

ORDER granting 258 Motion to Amend/Correct, ORDERED that the Joint Discovery Plan (Dkt. No. 247) and corresponding SchedulingOrder (Dkt. No. 248) shall be amended as follows 4. Motions in Limine --- ORDERED that, all other deadlines will remain unchanged (see order for details). Signed by District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee on 8/20/2012. (klau, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

(Alexandria Division)
ROSETTA STONE LTD.

Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO. I:09cv736
v.

(GBL/TCB)

GOOGLE INC.
Defendant.

ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION OF the parties* Consent Motions to Alter or Amend Deadlines
(Dkt. Nos. 249, 258), it is hereby

ORDERED thatparties' Motions to Alter or Amend Deadlines are GRANTED; and it
is hereby further

ORDERED that the Joint Discovery Plan (Dkt. No. 247) and corresponding Scheduling
Order (Dkt. No. 248) shall be amended as follows
4.

a.

Motions in Limine.

Google intends to file motions in limine based on the historical record to

clarify the scope of the case eligible to go to the jury; Google believes

that these rulings may later justify a motion for summary judgment on
some or all of Rosetta Stone's claims in view of intervening legal
developments. Rosetta Stone believes that all motions in limine should

be filed at the same time shortly before trial as set forth in paragraph
4(b).

Subject to and without waiving Rosetta Stone's arguments

regarding any such motions filed by Google, the parties have agreed to
the following schedule: