Wye Oak Technology, Inc. v. Republic of Iraq

Filing 41

ORDER entered re: 19 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss:Upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19 ), the memoranda and exhibits in support thereof, including Defendant's Supplemental Filing in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Rule 44.1 Notice (Doc. No. 29 ), the opposition thereto, and the argument of counsel at the hearing held on June 22, 2010, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is herebyORDERED that Defendant&# 039;s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19 ) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED; and it is furtherORDERED that this case be, and the same hereby is, TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(f)(4). Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 06/29/2010. (kbro)

Download PDF
Wye Oak Technology, Inc. v. Republic of Iraq Doc. 41 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division WYE OAK TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. REPUBLIC OF IRAQ ) ) ) ) No. l:09cv793(AJT/JFA) Defendant. ) ORDER Upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19), the memoranda and exhibits in support thereof, including Defendant's Supplemental Filing in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Rule 44.1 Notice (Doc. No. 29), the opposition thereto, and the argument of counsel at the hearing held on June 22, 2010, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that this case be, and the same hereby is, TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(f)(4). The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order and accompanying Memorandum Opinion to all counsel of record. Anthony J. Trenga United States District Judge Alexandria, Virginia June 29,2010 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?