Wye Oak Technology, Inc. v. Republic of Iraq
Filing
41
ORDER entered re: 19 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss:Upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19 ), the memoranda and exhibits in support thereof, including Defendant's Supplemental Filing in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Rule 44.1 Notice (Doc. No. 29 ), the opposition thereto, and the argument of counsel at the hearing held on June 22, 2010, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is herebyORDERED that Defendant 039;s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19 ) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED; and it is furtherORDERED that this case be, and the same hereby is, TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(f)(4). Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 06/29/2010. (kbro)
Wye Oak Technology, Inc. v. Republic of Iraq
Doc. 41
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division
WYE OAK TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v.
REPUBLIC OF IRAQ
) ) )
)
No. l:09cv793(AJT/JFA)
Defendant.
)
ORDER
Upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19), the memoranda and exhibits in support thereof, including Defendant's Supplemental Filing in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Rule 44.1 Notice (Doc. No. 29), the opposition thereto, and the argument of counsel at the hearing held on June 22, 2010, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying
Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19) be, and the same hereby
is, DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that this case be, and the same hereby is, TRANSFERRED to the United
States District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(f)(4).
The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order and accompanying Memorandum
Opinion to all counsel of record.
Anthony J. Trenga
United States District Judge
Alexandria, Virginia
June 29,2010
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?