Trustees of The Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. Artroz LLC
Filing
16
ORDER. The Court conducted a de novo review of the evidence in this case and adopts and incorporates the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 11) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that default judgment be, and the same hereby is, entered against Defendant in favor of Plaintiffs, as to plaintiff Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, in the amount of $8,499.75 in unpaid contributions; $849.98 in liquidated damages; $1,297.37 in accrued interest through February 26, 2010; $1,130.00 in reasonable attorneys' fees; $696.29 in costs; plus interest accruing from February 26, 2010 until date of payment accruing at the rate of 12% per annum, for a total award to plaintiff Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund of $12,473.39 plus interest and, as to plaintiff International Training Fund, in the amount of $261.53 in unpaid contributions, $52.31 in liquidated damages; $39.92 in accrued interest through February 26, 2010; plus interest accruing from February 26, 2010 until date of payment accruing at the rate of 12% per annum, for a total award to plaintiff International Training Fund of $353.76 plus interest. (See Order For Details). Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 4/15/10. (nhall)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND
PIPEFITTERS NATIONAL PENSION
)
)
FUND, et ai, Plaintiffs, v. ARTOZ LLC t/a NEXLEVEL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL
SERVICES a/k/a NEXLEVEL
)
)
)
)
) ) )
)
Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-1259-AJT-TCB
)
MECHANICAL Defendant.
)
)
)
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 15) of the
Magistrate Judge recommending that default judgment be entered against Artoz LLC t/a NexLevel Mechanical and Electrical Services a/k/a NexLevel Mechanical ("Defendant") in favor
of plaintiff Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund in the amount of $12,473.39 and plaintiff Trustees of the International Training Fund in the amount of $353.76. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court conducted a de
novo review of the evidence in this case and adopts and incorporates the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 11) be, and the same
hereby is, GRANTED; it is further
ORDERED that default judgment be, and the same hereby is, entered against Defendant
in favor of Plaintiffs, as to plaintiff Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, in the amount of $8,499.75 in unpaid contributions; $849.98 in liquidated damages;
SI,297.37 in accrued interest through February 26, 2010; $1,130.00 in reasonable attorneys'
fees; $696.29 in costs; plus interest accruing from February 26, 2010 until date of payment
accruing at the rate of 12% per annum, for a total award to plaintiff Trustees of the Plumbers and
Pipefitters National Pension Fund of $12,473.39 plus interest and, as to plaintiff International
Training Fund, in the amount of $261.53 in unpaid contributions, $52.31 in liquidated damages;
$39.92 in accrued interest through February 26,2010; plus interest accruing from February 26,
2010 until date of payment accruing at the rate of 12% per annum, for a total award to plaintiff
International Training Fund of $353.76 plus interest.
The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Order pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 58 and to forward copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to:
Arthur Rob, Jr. 13003 Murphy Road, Suite LI
Stafford, TX 77477
Anthony J. T^enga
United States District Judge
Alexandria, Virginia April 15, 2010
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?