Myers v. Lee et al

Filing 75

ORDER entered re: 18 Motion to Dismiss; 22 Motion to Dismiss; 26 Motion to Dismiss ; 29 Motion to Dismiss; 32 Motion to Dismiss; and 45 Motion to Dismiss:Upon consideration of the motions to dismiss filed by defendants, the opposition s thereto, and the argument of counsel at the hearing held on June 4, 2010, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is herebyORDERED that the motions to dismiss be, and the same hereby are, GRANTED in part and DEN IED in part; and it isFURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss as to counts I and II be, and the same hereby are, DENIED as to all defendants; it is FURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss as to counts V and VI be, and the s ame hereby are, DENIED as to defendant Dahn Yoga & Healing Family Center and GRANTED as to all other defendants, with leave to amend the complaint; it isFURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss as to count VII be, and the same he reby are, GRANTED; it isFURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss as to count VIII be, and the same hereby are, DENIED as to defendant Dahn Yoga & Healing Family Center and GRANTED as to all other defendants, with leave to amend the complaint, it isFURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss as to count IX are GRANTED as to all defendants; it isFURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss as to count X is GRANTED as to all defendants, with leave to amend the complaint; it is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss by defendant Dahn World for lack of personal jurisdiction be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice; and it isFURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff file any amended complaint on or before July 23, 2010. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 07/12/2010. (kbro )

Download PDF
Myers v. Lee et al Doc. 75 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division ANDREW H. MYERS, ) Plaintiff, v. SEUNG HEUN LEE, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) No. l:10cvl31 (AJT/JFA) ORDER Upon consideration of the motions to dismiss filed by defendants (Doc. Nos. 18, 22,26, 29, 32, and 45), the oppositions thereto, and the argument of counsel at the hearing held on June 4, 2010, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions to dismiss be, and the same hereby are, GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss as to counts I and II be, and the same hereby are, DENIED as to all defendants; it is FURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss as to counts V and VI be, and the same hereby are, DENIED as to defendant Dahn Yoga & Healing Family Center and GRANTED as to all other defendants, with leave to amend the complaint; it is FURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss as to count VII be, and the same hereby are, GRANTED; it is Dockets.Justia.com FURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss as to count VIII be, and the same hereby are, DENIED as to defendant Dahn Yoga & Healing Family Center and GRANTED as to all other defendants, with leave to amend the complaint, it is FURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss as to count IX are GRANTED as to all defendants; it is FURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss as to count X is GRANTED as to all defendants, with leave to amend the complaint; it is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss by defendant Dahn World for lack of personal jurisdiction be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff file any amended complaint on or before July 23, 2010. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion to all counsel of record. Anthony J. Trenga Unitecl States District Judge Alexandria, Virginia July 12,2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?