Cvent, Inc. v. Eventbrite, Inc. et al
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER RE: PLAINITFF'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY CONCERNING IDENTITY OF DOE 1-10. ( see Order for details) Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 5/19/10. (tfitz, )
Cvent, Inc. v. Eventbrite, Inc. et al
Doc. 21
Lr
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
CVENT, INC.
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
)
v. EVENTBRITE, INC. and DOES 1-10, individuals and/or business entities of unknown nature,
Defendants.
)
)
Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-481 (LMB)
)
) ) )
)
)
)
STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY CONCERNING IDENTITY OF DEFENDANTS DOE 1-10 AND
LITIGATION STANDSTTIJ,
Plaintiff Cvent, Inc. ("Cvent") and Defendant Eventbrite, Inc. ("Eventbrite") hereby
stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Eventbrite consents to the relief requested in Plaintiffs Motion for Expedited Discovery Concerning Identity of Defendants Doe 1-10. Plaintiff shall be permitted to issue a
Request for Production of Documents and a subpoena duces tecum substantially in the
form attached to this Stipulation and Consent Order as attachments A and B, respectively.
Eventbrite agrees to produce the documents specified in the Request for Production of
Documents within ten (10) days, as specified in that Request.
Dockets.Justia.com
2.
Subject to the discovery requests set forth in paragraph 1, above, Cvent agrees to refrain
from prosecution of this litigation against Eventbrite for a period often (10) days from
the date of this Stipulation and Consent Order. Nothing in this Stipulation and Consent Order is intended to constrain or prohibit Cvent from prosecuting this litigation against defendants Doe 1-10, including but not limited to the service of process on one or more
of those defendants. Eventbrite's time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint
in this action shall be extended by ten (10) days.
3. During the pendency of this action, each party agrees not to download or otherwise
obtain data from the website of the other, or access the other's website without
authorization, and will not induce, encourage, cause or materially contribute to any other
person or entity doing the same. Nothing herein shall bar Cvent from accessing Eventbrite's website to monitor compliance with this Order.
4. During the pendency of this action, Eventbrite agrees to maintain the status quo, as of the
date of this Order, of the contents of the relevant sections of its website, specifically
including the "venue directory" section referenced in Cvent's Complaint, and shall not
create or publish any other sections providing comparable functionality.
5. Paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Stipulation and Consent Order shall not apply to the actions of
outside counsel and their consultants taken in connection with the prosecution or defense
of this action.
6. Cvent and Eventbrite agree that this Stipulation and Consent Order render Plaintiffs
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction moot as
to Eventbrite, but does not does not affect those Motions as to any other person or entity,
including but not limited to defendants Doe 1-10.
Dated: May 19, 2010 Respectfully submitted,
PLAINTIFF CVENT, INC.
/s/ Oliver Garcia
DEFENDANT EVENTBRITE, INC.
/s/ Eric J. Feigin
Paul C. Rauser (admitted pro hac vice)
Eric J. Feigin (VSB #72931) Deneen J. Melander (VSB #27445)
Oliver Garcia (Va Bar No. 70087)
AEGIS LAW GROUP LLP
901 F Street, N.W., Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20004
ROBBINS, RUSSELL, ENGLERT, ORSECK, UNTEREINER & SAUBER LLP
1801 K Street N.W., Suite 411L
Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 775-4500 (phone) (202) 775-4510 (fax)
Tel: (202) 737-3500/Fax: (202) 737-3330 email: ogarcia@aegislawgroup.com
Attorneys for Cvent, Inc.
efeigin @robbinsrussell .com Attorneys for Eventbrite, Inc.
SO ORDERED.
Leonie M. Brinkema
United States District Judge
Date::
/H
30 [O
0
EXHIBIT A
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
CVENT, INC.
Plaintiff,
j
)
v-
)
)
Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-481
EVENTBRITE, INC.
)
entities of unknown nature,
and DOES 1-10, individuals and/or business
Defendants.
)
)
)
FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT EVENTBRITE. INC. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34 and order of the Court, Plaintiff
PLAINTIFF CVENT, INr.'fi
Cvent. Inc., by and through undersigned counsel, hereby requests that Defendant Eventbrite, toe.
produce for inspection and copying the documents described below at the oflHces of Aegis Law Group LLP, 901 F Street, N.W., Suite 500, Washington, D.C. 20004, within ten (10) days fiom
service hereof. .
DEFINITIONS
1.
The term "document" has the broadest allowable meaning under the.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
2.
The term "person" means any individual, company, corporation,
partnership, association, business trust or other form of legal entity.
3.
The term "identify" when used with respect to an individual, means to
provide (1) his or her name; (2) business affiliation and official title and/or position; and (3) his
or her last known residential address, business address, telephone number, and electronic mail
address.
4.
"Identify" when used with respect to a company or other business entity
means to provide: (1) the company's legal name, any former names, and the name under which it
trades or does business; (2) the address of its principal place of business; and (3) the identity of
its chief executive officer.
5.
The term "venues directory" refers to the group of web pages on the
website eventbrite.com and/or managed by Eventbrite, Inc. that provide venue-specific
information on venues (including hotels, restaurants, and other locations) such as capacity,
location, amenities, and text descriptions. The term includes the city-specific pages containing links to particular venues, and should be construed to include all eventbrite.com and Eventbritemanaged pages referenced in Plaintiffs Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Its
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction.
6.
The use of a verb in any tense shall be construed as the use of the verb in
all other tenses whenever necessary to bring within the scope of the request all documents that
might otherwise be construed to be outside its scope.
7.
The connective "and" shall be construed either disjunctively or
conjunctively as necessaiy to bring within the scope of the discovery request all documents that
might otherwise be construed to be outside of its scope.
8.
versa.
The use of the singular form of any word includes the plural and vice
INSTRUCTIONS
1.
This request applies to all documents in your possession, custody or
control, or in the possession, custody, or control of your agents, servants, employees, representatives, attorneys, or by any other persons or entities acting, or who has acted, on your
behalf.
2.
If, in responding to any of these requests, you encounter any ambiguity in
construing either the request or a definition or instruction relevant to it, in your response set form the matter deemed ambiguous and the construction selected or used in responding to the request.
3. If any document necessary for fulfillment of this request was, but no
longer is, in your possession or subject to your control and cannot be produced by you, state for such document whether the document is missing or lost, has been destroyed, has been transferred
voluntarily or involuntarily to others, or has been otherwise disposed of, and in each instance
explain the circumstances surrounding the disposition of the document, state the date or
approximate date of that disposition, and identify the person who you believe has control of the
document
4.
If privilege is claimed with respect to any document necessary for
fulfillment of this request, state the following concerning the document: (a) the date of the
document; (b) the name of the person who prepared, signed or participated in the preparation of the document and the relationship of that person(s) to you; (c) the name of each person to whom
the document was addressed, given or sent, or who received such document or copy thereof, and
the relationship of that person(s) to you; (d) the identity of each person having possession,
3
custody or control of the document or copy thereof, and the relationship of that person(s) to you;
(e) the subject matter or the circumstances of its preparation in sufficient detail to ascertain the applicability of the privilege or the claim of privilege; and (f) the legal or factual basis for any
claim that such document is privileged or otherwise not a proper subject for discovery.
5. This request is continuing in character and requires further response if
additional documents necessary for fulfillment of the request are obtained or located subsequent
to your initial response.
REQUEST
1.
Documents sufficient to identify all persons involved in the conception, planning,
and creation of Eventbrite's venues, directory.
Respectfully submitted, AEGIS LAW GROUP LLP
By: __
Paul C. Rauser (application for admission pro hoc
Thomas Shakow (Va Bar No. 70291) (application
.
Washington, D.C. 20004
iaii
Oliver Garcia (Va Bar No. 70087)
vice pending)
901 F Street, N.W', Suite 500
for admission pending)
email:
Tel: (202) 737-3500/Fax: (202) 737-3330
Attorneysfar Cvent, Inc.
Dated: May ,2010
EXHIBIT B
United States District Court
for the
Western District of Michigan
Cvent, Inc.
Plaintiff
V.
i
)
)
Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-4B1
(If the action is pending iq another district, slate where: Eastern District of Virginia
Evanttorite, Inc. and DOES 1-10
Defendant
SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS
OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES
To: Liquid Web, Inc., 4210 S. Creyts Road, Lansing, Ml 48917
T ^ COMMANDED to P»d<*e «the time, date, and place set forth below the following
Place: TO BE ENTERED BY PLAINTIFF
Date and Time:
TO BE ENTERED BY PLAINTIFF
£T££^.°f "T"" by y°° 3t *e *»· the property or any designated object or the req^estmg may mspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample ^ d l0C8ti0n ·« forth W^« *£openSn on if
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?