MeadWestvaco Corporation et al v. Rexam PLC et al

Filing 347

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Plaintiffs MeadWestvaco Corp. and MeadWestvaco Calmar, Inc.'s objections 255 are OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that Judge Jones' Order denying MVW's Motion to Compel 251 is AFFIRMED. Signed by District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee on 7/18/11. (tfitz, )

IN THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT

COURT

FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION,

et al.,

Plaintiffs,
Case No.

I:10cv511

(GBL/TRJ)
REXAM PLC,

et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs MeadWestvaco

Corp. and MeadWestvaco Calmar,

Inc.'s (together,

"MWV") Motion

Regarding Objections to Magistrate Judge's Ruling on Plaintiff's
Motion to Compel.
Rexam,

(Dkt. No. 251.)

PLC's ("Rexam")

This case concerns Defendant

alleged patent infringement.

In its

motion, Plaintiff objects to Judge Jones' Order denying MWV's

motion to compel all of Rexam's x-ray diffraction ("XRD")
"crystallinity test results, data,
242.)

and protocols."

(Dkt. No.

The Court overrules Plaintiff's Objection and affirms

Judge Jones' Order because there was no clear error and the
ruling was not contrary to law.