BTG International Ltd. v. Kappos
Filing 47
MEMORANDUM OPINION, the Court concludes, as a matter of law, that the scope of this action is not limited to the patentability of claim 102 and that BTG is entitled to seek a patent as to any of its claims involved in the Board's decision, separ ate and apart from claim 102, and to present all "competent evidence" in support of the patentability of those claims. The USPTO's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Limiting This Action to the Representative Claim [Doc. No. 27] is DENIED. (See Order For Details). Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 12/6/12. (nhall)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
