Ilex Construction and Development, Inc. v. Pritchard et al
Filing
20
ORDER that the pltf's 12 Motion for Default Judgment be, and the same hereby is GRANTED; Default Judgment be, and the same hereby is, entered against the defts, Thomas W. Pritchard and and Haifleigh Hall Pritchard jointly and severally, on pltf's claim for breach of contract in the amount of $180,716.66 plus interest at the federal rate from the date of judgment until paid (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 07/23/13. (pmil)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
ILEX CONSTRUCTION AND
DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-157 (AJT/JFA)
THOMAS W. PRITCHARD, et. al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 19] of the
Magistrate Judge recommending that default judgment be entered in favor of Ilex Construction
and Development, Inc. and against the defendants, Thomas W. Pritchard and Haifleigh Hall
Pritchard. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court
conducted a de novo review of the evidence in this case and adopts and incorporates the findings
and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the plaintiffs motion for default judgment [Doc. No. 12] be, and the
same hereby is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that default judgment be, and the same hereby is, entered against the
defendants, Thomas W. Pritchard and Haifleigh Hall Pritchard, jointly and severally, on
plaintiffs claim for breach of contract in the amount of $180,716.66 plus interest at the federal
rate from the date ofjudgment until paid.
The Clerk is directed to enter judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 and 58, and to send
a copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to the defendants, pro se, at:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?