Everage v. Wright

Filing 16

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 9/9/14. (gwalk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Michael Lee Everage, Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) l:13cv510(JCC/JFA) ) Benjamin Wright, Respondent. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael Lee Everage, a Virginia inmate proceeding rjro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254, challenging the constitutionality of his conviction of first degree murder entered in the Circuit Court for the City of Virginia Beach. After respondent moved lo dismiss the petition, Everage was given the opportunity to file responsive materials, pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison. 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975) and Local Civil Rule 7(K), and he has filed a reply. Accordingly, the matter is now ripe for disposition. After careful review, the petition will be dismissed with prejudice. I. Background On December 22, 2008, a jury convicted Everage of first degree murder for the bludgeoning death of his wife, Robyn. Case No. CR07-2653. The facts underlying the conviction were described by the Court of Appeals of Virginia as follow: On February 19. the day the victim was last seen alive, appellant received a taxi ride from his car, parked approximately thirty minutes away, to the victim's residence. Appellant later traveled to an automotive supply store and bought a side-view mirror for a Ford vehicle. The receipt for the item and its packaging were located on the victim's property, and appellant's fingerprints were on the packaging. Appellant was seen at the victim's house that day. He operated a loud generator and loaded something into the victim's car, which was backed into the driveway. A neighbor saw appellant drive away in the victim's car between 2:30

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?