Guerrero v. Weeks

Filing 93

ORDER, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Pltf's 86 Objections to Magistrate Judge's Ruling or Recommendation are OVERRULED; the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings of fact and accepts the Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 02/26/14. (Copy of Memorandum Opinion and Order mailed to pro se pltf) (pmil, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division ESPERANZA GUERRERO, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. AMY T. WEEKS, Defendant. 1:13cv837(JCC/JFA) O R D E R For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff Esperanza Guerrero’s Objections to Magistrate Judge Anderson’s Report and Recommendation [86] are OVERRULED; (2) the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings of fact and accepts the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge [82]; (3) Plaintiff may appeal this decision by filing written notice of appeal within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order; and (4) the Clerk of the Court shall forward copies of this Order and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion to all counsel of record and to Plaintiff, pro se. February 26, 2014 Alexandria, Virginia _/s/____ James C. Cacheris UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?