Zoroastrian Center and Darb-E-Mehr of Metropolitan Washington, D.C. v. Rustam Guiv Foundation of New York et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 1/4/2017. (awac)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ZOROASTRIAN CENTER AND DaRB-E-MEHR OF
Metropolitan Washington, D.C.,
Civil Action No. l-13-cv-980
Rustam Guiv Foundation, et al..
This matter comes before the Court on remand from the Fourth Circuit Court ofAppeals,
Dkt. No. 140. The Fourth Circuit remanded the case only with respect to the calculation of
attorneys' fees. For the reasons discussed below, the Court ORDERS Defendants to submit an
appropriate downward adjustment ofattorneys' fees, and supporting evidence as appropriate,
within twenty-one (21) days ofthe issuance ofthis Order. Plaintiffshall have fourteen (14) days
to respond to Defendants' filing if it so chooses.
This dispute arose out ofafailed effort to construct aZoroastrian worship center in
Fairfax, Virginia. Plaintiff, Zoroastrian Center and Darb-E-Mehr ofMetroplitan Washington
D.C. entered into aninety-nine year lease with Defendants Rustam Guiv Foundation ofNew
York, the land owner, and other trustee defendants. Following difficulties in the relationship,
Defendants terminated the lease. Article XIII ofthe parties' lease states that "[i]n the event of
any litigation between the parties hereto, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to
' TOs Background section focuses on ftcts relevant to the present Motion. Amore fulsome recitation ofthe
extensive fectual record can be found in the Court's May 12,2014 Memorandum Opinion. See Dkt. No. 80.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?