Agha v. Sun Trust Bank
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER. ORDERED that Defendant SunTrust Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment 38 is GRANTED, and Counts I, II, and III are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 2/9/2015. (rban, )
EHb!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
I FEB -9 2015
>
_J
..'nTus"•• • •'• -•'•
Alexandria Division
Alia Agha,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. l:14-cv-102
v.
SunTrust Bank,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant SunTrust Bank's Motion for Summary
Judgment. Dkt. No. 38. The plaintiff filed her opposition, to which the defendant replied. The
Court heard oral argument on January 16, 2015. For the reasons stated in open court, as well as
those set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.
Background1
This controversy arises out of a deaf woman's claim that her former employer
discriminated against her in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act
("ADAAA") by wrongfully terminating her and failing to accommodate her needs. Plaintiff Alia
Agha was born partially deaf. She has 100% hearing loss in her right ear and 65% hearing loss
in her left ear. To communicate with others, she uses a hearing aid and has learned to read lips.
Agha was hired by Defendant SunTrust Bank "(SunTrust") on December 24, 2012 as a Client
Service Specialist I. This position, according to SunTrust's official job description, entails duties
such as cash handling, processing teller transactions like deposits, and lobby management. As a
Because this matter comes before the Court onsummary judgment, the facts are presented in the light most
favorable to the Plaintiff.
I
••'•-'^
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?