GRENADIER v. BWW LAW GROUP et al

Filing 65

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 1/30/2015. (rban, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) V. l:14cv827(LMB/TCB) ) ) ) ) BWW LAW GROUP, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are three motions to dismiss plaintiffs Ammended Verifyed Complaint [sic] ("Amended Complaint"), plaintiffs opposition to each motion to dismiss, three miscellaneous motions filed by plaintiff, and plaintiffs motion for default judgment against two of the defendants. For the reasons that follow, defendants' motions to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) will be granted, which decision will render all ofplaintiffs motions moot. Therefore, all her motions will be denied.' I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier ("plaintiff" or "Grenadier"), proceeding pro se. initiated this civil action to prevent future foreclosure attempts on her property and to recover damages against seven defendants: BWW Law Group ("BWW"); Howard N. Bierman ("Bierman"); Equity Trustees, LLC ("Equity"); Mark R. Galbraith ("Galbraith"); Wells Fargo, National Association, as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-2, Asset-Backed Certificates, ' Inone ofthose motions [Dkt. No. 49], plaintiffasks that all judges inthis district berecused from handling this action because she is concerned about one judge, not the undersigned. There is no merit to that motion, which will be denied on the merits.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?