GRENADIER v. BWW LAW GROUP et al
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 1/30/2015. (rban, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
V.
l:14cv827(LMB/TCB)
)
)
)
)
BWW LAW GROUP,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the Court are three motions to dismiss plaintiffs Ammended Verifyed Complaint
[sic] ("Amended Complaint"), plaintiffs opposition to each motion to dismiss, three
miscellaneous motions filed by plaintiff, and plaintiffs motion for default judgment against two of
the defendants. For the reasons that follow, defendants' motions to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(b)(6) will be granted, which decision will render all ofplaintiffs motions moot. Therefore, all
her motions will be denied.'
I.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier ("plaintiff" or "Grenadier"), proceeding pro se. initiated
this civil action to prevent future foreclosure attempts on her property and to recover damages
against seven defendants: BWW Law Group ("BWW"); Howard N. Bierman ("Bierman");
Equity Trustees, LLC ("Equity"); Mark R. Galbraith ("Galbraith"); Wells Fargo, National
Association, as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-2, Asset-Backed Certificates,
' Inone ofthose motions [Dkt. No. 49], plaintiffasks that all judges inthis district berecused from
handling this action because she is concerned about one judge, not the undersigned. There is no
merit to that motion, which will be denied on the merits.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?