Tavares v. United Airlines, Dulles Airport et al
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION re Defendants' 26 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 8/24/15. (dper)
/
.
rr\i
! j
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
AUG 2 h 2015
Alexandria Division
i
)
TULLY TAVARES,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
United Airlines, et al.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. l:14-cv-l 121
Hon. Liam O'Grady
)
J
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed by defendants United
Airlines, Inc., United Continental Holdings, Inc., Marcelo Merlan, and Chris Branch ("the
United defendants"). (Dkl. No. 26). The pro se plaintiff filed an opposition. (Dkt. No. 34). On
August 21, 2015, the Court heard oral argument. During oral argument, the plaintiffsubmitted
additional exhibits to the Court.
I. Procedural History
On August 29, 2014, plaintiff Tully Tavares ("Tavares" or "plaintiff) filed a complaint
against the defendants based on alleged employment discrimination. He filed an amended
complaint on September 2, 2014. He then filed a motion to file a second amended complaint,
which was granted. On September 29, 2014, the second amended complaint was filed. The
United defendants moved for dismissal of the second amended complaint. Following a hearing,
during which the Court discussed with the pro se plaintiff the deficiencies in his complaint, the
Court granted the motion to dismiss without prejudice to the plaintiff to refile his claims within
120 days. (Dkt. No. 24). On May 14, 2015, Tavares filed his third amended complaint against
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?