Chacon Santamaria v. GL Construction, Inc. et al
Filing
16
ORDER granting 11 Motion for Default Judgment; and it is hereby ORDERED that a default judgment in the total amount of $31,603.50 be and is awarded in favor of plaintiff, Pedro Maul Chacon Santamaria, against defendants GL Construction, Inc. and Jose Lopez, jointly and severally; and it is further ORDERED that attorney's fees in the amount of $4,870.50 and costs in the amount of $503.64 to cover the filing fee and service of process be and are awarded in favor of plaintiff, Pedro Maul Chacon Santamaria, against defendants GL Construction, Inc. and Jose Lopez, jointly and severally. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 1/15/16. (c/s) (gwalk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
PEDRO MAUL CHACON SANTAMARIA,
Plaintiff,
l:15-cv-00259(LMB/IDD)
v.
GL CONSTRUCTION, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("Report") issued by a magistrate
judge on December 28, 2015 [Dkt. No. 15]. The Report recommends that default judgment be
entered against defendants and that plaintiff be awarded $31,603.50 in damages for unpaid
minimum hourly and overtime wages, along with $4,870.50 in attorney's fees and $503.64 in
litigation costs. See Report at 11-12. The parties were advised that any objections to the Report
must be filed within 14 days and that failure to file a timely objection waives the right to appeal
the substance of the Report and any judgment based upon the Report. As of January 14, 2016, no
party has filed an objection.
The Court has reviewed the Report, plaintiffs motion, and the file and adopts the Report
in its entirety. The magistrate judge correctly determined that the Court has subject matter
jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, due to plaintiffs claims under the Fair
Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201,etseq„ and that the Court has personal
jurisdiction over both defendants because GL Construction, Inc. is a Virginia corporation and
Jose Lopez is a Virginia resident. See Report at 2. Because both defendants are Virginia
residents and Jose Lopez resides in this district, venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1391(b)(1). The record also shows that both defendants were properly served and that neither
filed any response to the complaint. On June 18, 2015, the Clerk entered a default against both
defendants.
The Court further finds that the magistrate judge properly calculated the damages after
making an appropriate correction, and the attorney's fees and costs to which plaintiff is entitled
based on the documentation submitted with plaintiffs motion. Accordingly, plaintiffs Rule
55(b)(2) Motion for Entry of Default Judgment and Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs [Dkt.
No. 11 ] is GRANTED, and it is hereby
ORDERED that a default judgment in the total amount of $31,603.50' be and is awarded
in favor of plaintiff, Pedro Maul Chacon Santamaria, against defendants GL Construction, Inc.
and Jose Lopez, jointly and severally; and it is further
ORDERED that attorney's fees in the amount of $4,870.50 and costs in the amount of
$503.64 to cover the filing fee and service of process be and are awarded in favor of plaintiff,
Pedro Maul Chacon Santamaria, against defendants GL Construction, Inc. and Jose Lopez,
jointly and severally.
The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in plaintiffs favor pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 55 and to forward copies of this Order to counsel of record and to defendants at their
addresses of record in the file by certified mail return receipt requested.
Entered this /C
Alexandria, Virginia
day ofJanuary, 2016.
/J/^)
Leonie M. Brirkema
United Slates District Judse
' The Report calculated the total unpaid wages as $15,801.75 and then applied the liquidated damages provision of
the FLSA to double that amount to $31,603.50 pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). See Report at 10.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?