Persaud v. Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: Pltf's Petition for Review. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 03/27/17. (pmil, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
CHRISTOPHER PERSAUD,
Plaintiff,
)
V.
) Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00495
DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED
STATES PATENT AND
TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Defendant.
Memorandum Opinion
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff s Petition
for Review and Reversal of Defendant's decision to exclude him
from practicing before the United States Patent and Trademark
Office ("PTO").
Christopher Persuad ("Plaintiff") was admitted to practice
law in California on March 25, 2009. Nearly three years later,
on July 28, 2012, the State Bar of California ("Bar") suspended
Plaintiff from practicing law for three years because he had
unlawfully collected and retained around $300,000 in unearned
fees. The Bar ordered Plaintiff to pay restitution and engage in
rehabilitative training. Later, Plaintiff misrepresented to the
Bar that he had paid restitution when he actually had not paid
restitution to the clients he had defrauded. As a result, on
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?