Hughes v. INOVA Health Care Services

Filing 35

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 06/26/2017. (jlan)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division MICHELLELYNETTE HUGHES, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. l:16-cv-674 V. INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES d/b/a/ INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Inova Health Care Services d/b/a Inova Health System's ("Defendant" or "Inova") Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff MichelleLynette Hughes ("Plaintiff") worked as a Pathologists' Assistant for Inova for almost two years. Plaintiff alleges that Inova discriminated and retaliated against her in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, at seq., and that she was subject to retaliation in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq. Defendant is a non-profit healthcare system based in Northern Virginia. Between February 2007 and December 2013, Plaintiff worked part-time, under a contract, as a Pathologists' Assistant at Inova Loudoun Hospital. In this position.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?