Miller v. Gruenberg

Filing 34

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING defendant Martin Gruenberg's 23 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim, WITH PREJUDICE, and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. /s/ by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 3/31/17. (tbul, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Robert M. Me.ler, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. l;16-cv-856 MARTtN J. GRUENBERG, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Martin Gruenberg's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. Dkt. No. 23. Defendant argues that the Court lacks jurisdiction over certain claims in the SAC and that Plaintiff fails to set forth a claim on which relief can be granted on the remainder of his numerous express and implied causes of action. Plaintiff Robert Miller, proceeding pro se, filed the SAC against his former employer, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Civil Service Reform Act ("CSRA"). Specifically, Plaintiff contends that FDIC officials discriminated against him through nonselection for a number of promotions and special duties, because of his age, race, sex, and disabilities. Plaintiff also contends that he was retaliated against for prior protected Equal Employment Opportunity activity and that he was subject to a hostile work environment. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion and the Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?