Halozyme, Inc. v. Lee

Filing 173

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 7/31/2018. (rban, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division HALOZYME, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. l:16-cv-1580 V. ANDREI lANCU, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff Halozyme, Inc.'s ("Halozyme") Complaint pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145, seeking reversal of a patent rejection decision issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"). I. Background Halozyme brought this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145, challenging a final decision issued by the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the "Board") which affirmed the rejections of claims in U.S. application"). Patent The claims Application were 11/238,171 rejected on four ("the ^171 independent grounds: • unpatentable ("ODP") over 7,767,429 under obviousness-type double pantenting claims ("the M29 9 and 10 patent") of in U.S. view Patent of the No. U.S.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?