Coleman v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union et al

Filing 31

MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 3/17/17. Order to follow (gwalk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division CELIACOLEMAN, Plaintiff, l:17-cv-18 (LMB/IDD) V. PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, rtd,. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff Celia Coleman ("plaintiff" or"Coleman") has sued her former employer, the Pentagon Federal Credit Union ("defendant" or"PenFed"), alleging sexual harassment, a hostile work environment, and retaliation under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964,42 U.S.C. § 2000e et s^.; a hostile work environment, retaliation, and discriminatory discharge under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. §621 s^; as well as raising acommon law wrongful discharge claim.^ Plaintiffhas also named four individual PenFed employees as defendants: MunaHall ("Hall"), Shelia Boykin ("Boykin"), Veronica Dewald ("Dewald"), and Marilynn Wells ("Wells"). Plamtiff, who has been represented bycounsel throughout these proceedings, has filed a total offour complaints inthis case. On January 4,2017, plaintifffiled her original complaint [Dkt. 1], which was closely followed by an amended complaint [Dkt. 4] on January 13, 2017. On February 9,2017, defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss. The next day, February 10, plaintifffiled a second amended complaint [Dkt. 18], which corrected the numbering ofthe ^Plaintiff originally included claims for negligent supervision and negligent retention, which have now been dropped.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?