Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. v. Matal
MEMORANDUM OPINION re Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 2/13/18. (klau, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Civil Action No. l-17-cv-00776
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion
for Summary Judgment and Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary
Judgment. This action arises from Plaintiff's challenge of the
8,648,077 (the "'077 patent").
required to account for statutorily enumerated delays in the
USPTO's examination of the patent application as well as any
amount of time "during which the applicant failed to engage in
reasonable efforts to conclude prosecution of the application."
35 U.S.C. § 154(b)(2)(C)(i). To prevent a patent term's loss of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?