Allegheny Casualty Company v. River City Roofing, LLC et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION in re 7 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 04/13/2018. (jlan)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
APR I 3 2018
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
CLERK. LJ s
ALLEGHENY CASUALTY COMPANY,
Case No. I:17-cv-0il08 (IDD)
RIVER CITY ROOFING, LLC,
RODNEY G. YOUNG, ICAREN R. YOUNG,
and STERLING YOUNG,
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment. For the
reasons stated below, the Court has granted Plaintiffs Motion.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a), a party may move the court for
summary judgment on any claim or defense, and the court shall grant the motion and enter
judgment as a matter of law where the moving party has demonstrated that "there is no genuine
dispute as to any material fact" in the case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); Celotex Corp. v. Cairetl, All
U.S. 317, 330 (1986). A "genuine" issue concerning a "material" fact only arises when the
evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, sufficiently allows a
reasonable jury to return a verdict in that party's favor. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby Inc., 477 U.S.
242, 248 (1986). The governing substantive law will determine which facts are material, and a
fact will be material if a dispute as to that fact affects the outcome of the suit. Id.
To defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for summary judgment, the non1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?