Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company et al v. Davis Paige Management Systems LLC
Filing
12
ORDER- It is hereby ORDERED that the 8 Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED; the Court ADOPTS the findings and re 11 Report and Recommendations. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 on all counts o f the complaint in favor of Plaintiffs Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company; Trumbull Insurance Company; Sentinel Insurance Company, LTD; Hartford Casualty Insurance Company; and Twin City Fire Insurance Company, and against Defendant Davis Paige Management Systems LLC. Plaintiffs are AWARDED $150,190.44 plus post-judgment interest, calculated at the rate prescribed by 28 U.S.C. 1961. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 4/3/2018. (lcre, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS
INSURANCE COMPANY, ET al.,
Plaintiff,
Case No. l:17-cv-01254-LO-MSN
v.
DAVIS PAIGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
LLC,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United
States Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff dated March 6, 2018. Dkt. 11. Defendant did
not object to the R&R. The Court has reviewed the Complaint and Plaintiffs Motion for Default
Judgment (Dkt. 8) and ADOPTS the findings and recommendation of Judge Nachmanoff.
Accordingly, for the reasons cited by Judge Nachmanoff and for good cause shown,
Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter
judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 on all counts of the complaint in favor of Plaintiffs
Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company; Trumbull Insurance Company; Sentinel Insurance
Company, LTD; Hartford Casualty Insurance Company; and Twin City Fire Insurance
Company, and against Defendant Davis Paige Management Systems LLC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?