Green v. Sessions et al

Filing 33

MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 05/01/2018. (acha, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division DAVID GREEN, JR., Plaintiff, l:17-cv-01365-LMB-TCB V. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, et al.. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are the defendants' Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim [Dkt. Nos. 26 and 27] ("Defs. Mts. Dismiss"), to which plaintiff David Green, Jr. ("plaintiff or "Green"), who is pro se. has filed an opposition, [Dkt. No. 30] ("PI. Opp'n"). The defendants have filed a reply [Dkt. No. 31] ("Defs. Reply"), and the Court finds thatoral argument will not assist the decisional process. Forthe reasons that follow, the defendants' motions will be granted, and this civil action will be dismissed with prejudice.* I. BACKGROUND Green, a former employee of the United States Department of Justice Executive Office of Immigration Review ("EOIR"), has filed a six count Complaint against Jefferson B. Sessions III, Attorney General of the United States ("Sessions"); Katherine H. Reilly, Acting Deputy ' Normally, dismissal ofapro se litigant's complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) would be without prejudice to allow the plaintiff to correct pleading deficiencies if he had more facts to allege. The dismissal here will be with prejudice because Green attached to his Complaint hundreds of pages of exhibits which include, but are not limited to, his various performance appraisals, external email correspondence, the initial and final Department of Justice Equal Employment Opportunity investigative reports and decisions, and much of the Merit Systems Protection Board record. See generallv [Dkt. Nos. 1,13, 14]. Thoseexhibits contain no additional facts which could remedy the Complaint's pleading deficiencies and, instead, strongly support the conclusion that Green does not have a meritorious claim of being the victim of discrimination or retaliation.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?