Disinger v. Prestige Art Studios LLC et al

Filing 25

ORDER-Accordingly, this Court affirms the findings of the 23 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. It is hereby ORDERED that a default judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff Benjamin Disinger and against defendant Prestige Art Stu dios LLC, and that an order be entered that enjoins defendant Prestige Art Studios LLC, and its officers, agents, servants, employees, affiliated entities, and all those in active concert with it, from copying, displaying, and distributing plaintiff& #039;s Copyrighted Work. It is further ORDERED that judgment be entered against Prestige Art Studios LLC, in the amount of $13,883.90 (consisting of $9,600.00 in actual damages arising from the copyright infringement claim and $4,283.90 in attorney's fees and costs.) Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 9/13/2018. (See order for further details). (acha, ) Copy mailed to Defendant Pro-Se.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

BENJAMIN DISINGER,
Plaintiff,

Civil Action No. l:17-cv-1409

V.

PRESTIGE ART STUDIOS LLC,
et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER

THIS

MATTER

Recommendation

of

comes
the

before

the

Magistrate

Court

Judge

response to Plaintiff's Motion for

on

dated

Default

the
May

Report
1,

Judgment.

2018,

and
in

Defendant

Prestige Art Studio filed an objection on May 15, 2018.

Based on a ^ novo review of the evidence in this case,
having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, it appears to the
Court that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is

neither

clearly

erroneous

nor

contrary

to

law.

Defendant

Prestige Art Studios had the opportunity to appear and challenge
the motion for default judgment. Defendant elected not to do so

and now files a response that attempts to try a case that it
made no appearance in. The Defendant makes no motion to reopen
or show any just cause why there should be any further hearing