Gregory v. Chapman et al

Filing 26

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER. The Court hereby GRANTS the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendant Michael Chapman 14 and Defendants Board of Supervisors of Loudoun County, Virginia and Loudoun County, Virginia 17 . This case is hereby DISMISSED, and the Clerk of Court is instructed to enter final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of Fed. R. Civ. P. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 4/4/2018. (rban, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division JOHN W. GREGORY, > Plaintiff, MICHAEL L. CHAPMAN, et al., Defendants. ( ) Civil No. l:18-cv-16 j Hon- Liam °'Grady ' MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER This matter is before the Court on Motions to Dismiss by Defendant Michael Chapman (Dkt. 14) and Defendants Board of Supervisors of Loudoun County, Virginia ("the Board") and Defendant Loudoun County, Virginia ("the County") (Dkt. 17). Because the factual and legal issues are adequately presented in the materials before the Court, we dispense with oral argument and will resolve the motions on the record. For the reasons explained below and for good cause shown, the motions (Dkt. 14; Dkt. 17) are GRANTED and this case is hereby DISMISSED. I. Background On June 14,2015, PlaintiffJohn W. Gregory, in his capacity as a law enforcement officer and an employee of the Loudoun County Sheriffs Office, arrested an individual named Lyle Grenoble for public intoxication. Mr. Grenoble allegedly manifested signs of resistance and aggression. When they reached the station and as Mr. Grenoble exited Plaintiffs cruiser, Plaintiff threw Mr. Grenoble to the ground. As a result of this physical interaction, a criminal complaint for assault and battery was filed against Plaintiff in the General District Court of Loudoun County. On November 17,2015, thecourt found Plaintiffguilty, and Plaintiff thereafter appealed his conviction.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?