Franks v. Triple Canopy, Inc. et al

Filing 33

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Plaintiff's Modified Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint identical to the proposed amended complaint except that Count II, which alleges constitutional violation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981, be eliminated. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 7/23/2018. (rban, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

CHRIS E. FRANKS,
Plaintiff,

Civil Action No. l:18-cv-436

V.

TRIPLE CANOPY, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER

THIS

MATTER

comes

Recommendation of the
response

to

Complaint

before

Magistrate

Plaintiff's

and

the

Plaintiff's

Motion

Judge
for

Modified

Amended Complaint. The parties

Court

dated
Leave

Motion

have

on

the

June
to

for

Report

and

4, 2018, in
File

Leave

Amended
to

File

not filed objections, and

the time for filing such objections has lapsed.

Based on a ^ novo review of the evidence in this case,
having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, it appears to the

Court that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is
neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Accordingly, this
Court affirms the findings of the Magistrate Judge. It is hereby
ORDERED

Complaint
Amended

that

and

Plaintiff's

Plaintiff s

Complaint

be

Motion

Modified

GRANTED

IN

for

Leave

Motion

PART

and

for

to

File

Leave

DENIED

IN

Amended

to
PART,

File
and