Readding v. Meade et al
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 1/21/2020. (aott, c/m 1/22/2020)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
Brian Keith Redding
Plaintiff,
I:18cv589(LMB/TCB)
V.
Barbara Meade,et ah,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Brian Redding("Redding" or "plaintiff"), a Virginia inmate who suffers from
gastrointestinal problems, specifically, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, has filed a civil
rights action under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983, claiming that Rappahannock Regional Jail("RRJ")nurse
Barbara Meade("Meade" or "defendant")provided constitutionally deficient medical care in
violation ofthe Eighth Amendment.^ [Dkt. No. 1]. Meade has filed a motion for summary
judgment,supported by a legal memorandum and exhibits.[Dkt. Nos. 34-35]. Redding received
the notice required by Local Rule 7(K)and Roseboro v. Garrison. 528 F.2d 309(4th Cir. 1975),
and has filed an opposition to Meade's motion.[Dkt. Nos. 36, 39]. For the reasons that follow,
Meade's motion for summary judgment will be granted.
'Plaintiff also named as defendants Jennifer Shearer, a second RRJ nurse, and Phil Grimes,the
superintendent ofRRJ. Both defendants were dismissed from this action because Redding did
not allege sufficient conduct on their part to establish constitutional liability.[Dkt. No. 29].
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?