Gray v. Moynihan et al

Filing 10

ORDER- The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation as set forth in her 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection to Report and Recommendation Doc. No. 7 be, and the same hereb y is, OVERRULED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Doc. No. 2 be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that this action be, and the same hereby is DISMISSED; and it i s further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions for Stay Doc. No. 5 and Ex Parte Injunction Doc. No. 8 be, and the same hereby are, DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 09/05/2018. (acha, ) Copies mailed to Pro-Se plaintiff.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division

JOANNA GRAY,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action No. l:18-cv-0695 (AJT/MSN)

V.

BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN, et ah
Defendants.

ORDER

Pending is Plaintiffs Objection to Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 7] (the
"Objection") of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 4].

On June 11, 2018, Plaintiff filed a "Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights." [Doc. No.
1] ("Compl."). On June 13, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma

Pauperis [Doc. No. 2]. On July 19, 2018, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiffs
Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be conditionally granted and Plaintiffs
Complaint be dismissed. [Doc. No. 4] ("Report and Recommendation"). On July 30, 2018,

Plaintiff timely filed her Objection to the Report and Recommendation. In light of the Magistrate
Judge's recommendation of dismissal of the Complaint, the court must review the Magistrate
Judge's recommendations de novo. See Fed. Rule Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
The Court has reviewed in detail the Complaint and record before it, and after its de novo
review of the record, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation as set forth in her

Report and Recommendation. The Court finds that the Complaint fails to allege facts that make
plausible a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. As the Magistrate Judge correctly observed. Plaintiff "does

1