McDonald et al v. McPhun et al

Filing 202

ORDER, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Carla DeSilva McPhun and Cadem Capital Group's objection to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is OVERRULED, the 196 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED IN FULL, Pltf's 150 Motion for Sanctions and Entry of Default Judgment Against Defts Carla McPhun and Cadem Capital Group is GRANTED IN PART; the Clerk enter default against the McPhun Defts; pltfs promptly file a supplemental motion for def ault judgment specifically indicating how they are entitled to relief under each count of their complaint as well as the amount of their damages. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 01/10/19. (Copy of Memorandum Opinion and Order mailed to the McPhun Defts)(pmil, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division MATTHEW McDonald,etaL, Plaintiffs, l:18-cv-697(LMB/TCB) V. EDWARD G. ROBINSON III, et al.. Defendants. ORDER For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Carla DeSilva McPhun and Cadem Capital Group's(together, the "McPhun Defendants") objection [Dkt. No. 200] to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is OVERRULED,the report and recommendation [Dkt. No. 196] is ADOPTED IN FULL,Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions and Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendants Carla McPhun and Cadem Capital Group [Dkt. No. 150] is GRANTED IN PART,and it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk enter a default against the McPhun Defendants; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiffs promptly file a supplemental motion for defaultjudgment specifically indicating how they are entitled to relief under each count of their complaint as well as the amount of their damages. The Clerk is directed to forward copies ofthis Order to counsel of record and to the McPhun Defendants, pro se. Entered this /O day of January, 2019. Alexandria, Virginia Is! Leonie M.Brinkema United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?