Hargrove v. Hamilton
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 7/14/2021. (c/m 7/14/2021 shea)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
Jamie! M.Hargrove,
Petitioner,
)
)
)
V.
)
Israel Hamilton,
Respondent.
l:20cvll88(LO/JFA)
)
)
)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jamiel M.Hargrove, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of
habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his convictions for second-degree murder,
using a firearm in the commission ofa murder, robbery, conspiring to commit robbery, and using
a firearm in the commission of a robbery, entered in the Circuit Court of Danville, Virginia. Dkt.
No. 1; Resp't Ex. A-6. Respondent has filed a Motion to Dismiss and Rule 5 Answer, along with
a supporting brief. Dkt. Nos. 16-18. Hargrove received the notice required by Local Rule 7(K)
and Roseboro v. Garrison. 528 F.2d 309(4th Cir. 1975), Dkt. No. 19, and has not filed an
opposing brief. Because the state court rulings were not contrary to, or an unreasonable
application of, clearly established law, as determined by the Supreme Court ofthe United States,
or based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light ofthe evidence presented, the
§ 2254 petition will be dismissed.
I. Background
On September 11,2014, when Hargrove was seventeen years old, he and Tevin Stokes
shot and killed Paul Harper, Jr., during a drug purchase, then stole the drugs off his body before
fleeing. When police detectives from Danville, Virginia(where the crimes occurred)traveled to
Vance Coimty, North Carolina(where Hargrove lived) on October 30,2014, to interview him
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?