Bid for Position, LLC v. AOL, LLC et al

Filing 117

Bid for Position, LLC v. AOL, LLC et al

Doc. 117

FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Norfolk Division
CLERK, US. DISTRICT COURT
NORFOLK. VA

JUN

1 7 2008

BID FOR POSITION, LLC,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v.
AOL LLC,

Civil Action No. 2:07cv582 (JBF-TEM)

GOOGLE INC.,
MICROSOFT CORP.,

and MIVA, INC.,

Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs.

AGREED ORDER

On this day came the Plaintiff Bid for Position, LLC ("Plaintiff') and the Defendant Google Inc. ("Google"), by counsel, upon Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for an Order Sustaining Google's

Objection to Plaintiffs Designation of Dana Todd as a Technical Advisor Under the Protective Order
[Docket No. 92] ("Motion re: Todd"); and, it appearing to the Court that subsequent to the filing of

the Motion re: Todd, Plaintiff and Google reached an agreement regarding Ms. Todd's access to
certain documents, and, therefore, the Motion re: Todd has been mooted and should be withdrawn;
and, upon good cause shown it is

ADJUDGED, ORDERED and DECREED that the Motion re: Todd filed by Google on May
15, 2008 is moot and deemed to be withdrawn;

Pursuant to stipulation, Plaintiffs technical advisor Dana Todd will not be allowed access to
Protected Information that shows or discloses, in whole or in part (1) how Google calculates Ad

Rank, including the factors Google uses to rank advertisements; (2) the manner in which Google

Dockets.Justia.com

calculates costs to advertisers, including the factors Google uses to determine cost per click; and (3) how Google calculates Quality Score, including the factors Google uses to calculate quality score.
If Plaintiff propounds additional document requests on Google and Google reasonably

believes the requests call for Google to produce documents that should not be disclosed to Ms. Todd, Google will have seven days from service of the document requests to object to the disclosure of those documents to Ms. Todd. The objection will identify the specific document categories that
Google seeks to preclude from being disclosed to Ms. Todd. Plaintiff and Google will meet and

confer to resolve any issues or concerns raised in the objections. Seven days after the parties meet and confer, if the issues remain unresolved, Google will file a motion seeking to preclude Plaintiff from disclosing the objected to documents to Ms. Todd. Until the motion is resolved, Plaintiff will not disclose to Ms. Todd any of the documents that are the subject of the motion.

ENTER:

111

JUDGE: Ur

M. EasTeniTJistncTofVfrginia

WE ASK FOR THIS:

Joona

x 25367

(ian & Candles, P.C.

Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: [phone]

\st Main Street, Suite 2100
[phone]

Facsimile:

senoona(a>,kau fcan.com

[e-mail] [e-mail]

Charles K. Verhoeven, pro hac vice David A. Perlson, pro hac vice Emily C. O'Brien, pro hac vice Antonio R. Sistos, pro hac vice Katherine H. Bennett, pro hac vice Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail]

[e-mail]

katherinebennett(5),quinnemanuel .com

Thomas D. Pease, pro hac vice Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] t [e-mail]
Counselfor Google Inc.

WE ASK FOR THIS:

Craig T. Merritt (VSB No. 20281)
R. Braxton Hill, IV (VSB No. 41539) Nichole Buck Vanderslice (VSB No. 42637) Christian & Barton, LLP 909 East Main Street, Suite 1200 Richmond, VA 23219-3095 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] cmerritt(a),cblaw.com [e-mail] [e-mail]

Gregory S. Dovel, pro hac vice Christin K. Cho, pro hac vice DOVEL & LUNER, LLP

201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail] [e-mail]

David E. Rosen, pro hac vice
Murphy Rosen & Meylan, LLP

100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1300
Santa Monica, CA 90401 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

[e-mail]
Counselfor Bidfor Position, LLC

1375419X1