Bid for Position, LLC v. AOL, LLC et al
Filing
119
CONSENT ORDER granting
114 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims by AOL. AOL is Ordered to file its First Amended Answer and First Amended Counterclaim within three (3) business days of the entry of this order. It is further ordered that Bid for Position shall plead in response within ten (10) days thereafter. Signed by District Judge Jerome B. Friedman and filed on 6/19/08. Copies mailed 6/20/08. (lwoo)
Bid for Position, LLC v. AOL, LLC et al
Doc. 119
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Norfolk Division
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
NORFOLK. VA
jun 19 roos
BID FOR POSITION, LLC, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant,
v.
AOL LLC,
GOOGLE INC.,
Civil Action No. 2:07cv582 (JBF-TEM)
Jury Trial Demanded
MICROSOFT CORP., and MIVA, INC.,
Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs.
PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff AOL LLC's
("AOL") Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Bid for Position's Complaint for Patent Infringement filed on June 10, 2008.
Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Bid for Position, LLC ("Bid for Position") does not
oppose AOL's motion. Finding it in the interests ofjustice to do so, the Court hereby GRANTS AOL's Motion for
Leave to Amend its Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Bid for Position's Complaint for Patent Infringement. AOL is ORDERED to file its First Amended Answer and First Amended Counterclaims within three (3) business days of the entry of this Consent Order. It is
further ORDERED that Bid for Position shall plead in response to AOL's First Amended Answer,
Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Bid for Position's Complaint for Patent Infringement
within ten (10) days thereafter. It is so ORDERED.
Dockets.Justia.com
ENTER:
£ / (11
JUDGE-
Jerome B. Friedman
Eastern District of Virginia
WE ASK FOR THIS:
StephoMLNoona (VSB No. 25367)
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624-3000 Facsimile: (757)624-3169
scnoona@kaufcan.com
Kaufm^ij& Canoles, P.C.
John M. Williamson, pro hac vice Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP
901 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 iohn.williamson@finnegan.com
Robert L. Burns, II, pro hac vice Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 Telephone: (571)203-2700 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 robert.burns@.finnegan.com
Charles K. Verhoeven, pro hac vice David A. Perlson, pro hac vice Emily C. O'Brien, pro hac vice Antonio R. Sistos, pro hac vice
Katherine H. Bennett, pro hac vice
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415)875-6600 Facsimile: (415)875-6700 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com emilvobrien@quinnemanuel.com antoniosistos@quinnemanuel.com katherinebennett@quinnemanuel.com
Thomas D. Pease, pro hac vice QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010
Telephone: (212)849-7000 Facsimile: (212)849-7100 thomaspease@quinnemanuel.com
Counselfor AOL LLC
SEEN AND AGREED:
VSB
Steph
Kaufman & Canoles, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
jg
Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624-3000 Facsimile: (757)624-3169
senoona@kaufcan.com
Charles K. Verhoeven, pro hac vice David A. Perlson, pro hac vice
Emily C. O'Brien, pro hac vice Antonio R. Sistos, pro hac vice (Catherine H. Bennett, pro hac vice Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415)875-6600 Facsimile: (415)875-6700 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com cmilvobrien@quinnemanuel.com antoniosistos@quinnemanuel.com katherinebennett@quinnemanuel.com
Thomas D. Pease, pro hac vice Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 Telephone: (212)849-7000 Facsimile: (212)849-7100 thomaspease@quinnemanuel.com Counselfor Google Inc.
SEEN AND AGREED:
Michael W. Robinson (VSB No. 26522)
Venable LLP
William D. Dolan, IH'(v"SB No. 12455)
8010 Towers Crescent Drive, Suite 300 Vienna, VA 22182 Telephone: (703)760-1684 Facsimile: (703)821-8949 \vddolan;a;venahle.com inwrobinson@venable.coin
Richard A. Cederoth, pro hac vice Laura L. Kolb, pro hac vice
Sfdley Austin LLP
1 South Dearborn Street Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: (312)853-7000 Facsimile: (312)853-7036
rcederoth@sidlev.com lkolb@sidley.com
Counselfor Microsoft Corporation
SEEN AND AGREED;
LeClair Ryan, PC
DanaTFmbergWSB No. 34977^
Riverfront Plaza, East Tower
I
Richmond, VA 23219 Telephone: (804)916-7109
951 East Byrd Street, 8th Floor
Facsimile: (804)916-7219
dana.finbcrg@leclairrvan.com
Paul D. Ackcrman, pro hac vice
Aashccsh Shravah, pro hac vice Dorsey & Whitney LLP 250 Park Avenue New York, NY 10177 Telephone: (212)415-9200 Facsimile: (212)953-7201
ackcrman.paul(a:dorsev.com
shravah.aashccsh@dorscv.com
Counsel for MI VA, Inc.
SEEN AND AGREED:
Craig T. Merritt (VSB No. 20281) R. Braxton Hill, IV (VSB No. 41539) Nichole Buck Vanderslice (VSB No. 42637) Christian & Barton, LLP 909 East Main Street, Suite 1200 Richmond, VA 23219-3095 Telephone: (804)697-4100 Facsimile: (804)697-4112 cmerritt@cblaw.com bhill@cblaw.com nvanderslice@cblaw.com
Gregory S. Dovel, pro hac vice Christin K. Cho, pro hac vice
DOVEL & LUNER, LLP 201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600 Santa Monica, CA 90401
Telephone: (310)656-7066 Facsimile: (310)656-7069
greg@dovellaw.com christin@dovellaw.com
David E. Rosen, pro hac vice Murphy Rosen & Meylan, LLP 100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1300 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Telephone: (310)899-3300 Facsimile: (310)399-7201 drosen@miTnlawvers.com
Counselfor Bid for Position, LLC
I375I44M
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?