Murphy v. Johnson

Filing 10

FINAL ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 4 Motion to Dismiss filed by Gene M. Johnson, 9 Report and Recommendations. Ordering that the petition be Denied and Dismissed as the claims are procedurally defaulted and without merit; noting appeal procedures and declining to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 6/8/09. Copy mailed 6/9/09.(lwoo)

Download PDF
FILED UNITED FOR THE STATES DISTRICT COURT VIRG] NIA EASTERN DISTRICT OF Norfolk Division JUN -8 2003 NORFOLK VA CLERK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT CHRIS MURPHY, #380512, Petitioner, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09cv51 GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent. FINAL ORDER This matter was initiated by petition § 2254. to for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. federal The petition alleges violation of convictions on June 27, rights pertaining Petitioner's 2007 (1) in the Circuit Court of the City of Hampton, count of second degree murder and one (1) Virginia, of of one of a count use firearm in the commission of a felony, sentenced to serve a total of forty as a result of which he was years in prison for the (40) second degree murder charge and three (3) years in prison for the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony charge, five (25) The pursuant Rule with twenty- years matter to the of suspended. was referred to a United U.S.C. Civil States § Magistrate and Judge (C) , 72 of provisions of 28 of 636(b)(l)(B) 72(b) the Federal Rules Procedure and Rule the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for report and recommendation. The report of the Magistrate of Judge was filed on April 10, 2009 recommending dismissal the petition. By copy of the report, each party was advised of his right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the magistrate no response from either party. having reviewed the record, does hereby ADOPT AND judge. The Court received The Court, APPROVE the findings and recommendations set forth in the report of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on April 10, is, therefore, 2009, and it ORDERED that the petition be DENIED AND DISMISSED as the claims are procedurally that defaulted and without merit. It is further ORDERED judgment be entered in favor of Respondent. Petitioner may appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to this final order by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of Norfolk, this Court, United States Courthouse, (30) 600 Granby Street, from the date of Virginia 23510, within thirty days entry of such judgment. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate "a substantial Therefore, of showing the Court, of the denial of a constitutional of right." pursuant to Rule 22(b) declines v. to the Federal Rules a certificate U.S. 322, of Appellate Procedure, See issue 537 appealability. (2003). Miller-El Cockrell. 335-36 The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Final Order to Petitioner and to counsel of record for Respondent. Mark S. Davis United States District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Norfolk, ; Virginia 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?