Murphy v. Johnson
Filing
10
FINAL ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 4 Motion to Dismiss filed by Gene M. Johnson, 9 Report and Recommendations. Ordering that the petition be Denied and Dismissed as the claims are procedurally defaulted and without merit; noting appeal procedures and declining to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 6/8/09. Copy mailed 6/9/09.(lwoo)
FILED
UNITED FOR THE STATES DISTRICT COURT VIRG] NIA EASTERN DISTRICT OF
Norfolk Division
JUN -8 2003
NORFOLK VA
CLERK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT
CHRIS
MURPHY,
#380512, Petitioner,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:09cv51
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections,
Respondent.
FINAL
ORDER
This
matter was
initiated by petition § 2254.
to
for
a writ
of
habeas
corpus under 28 U.S.C.
federal
The petition alleges violation of
convictions on June 27,
rights pertaining
Petitioner's
2007
(1)
in the Circuit Court of the City of Hampton,
count of second degree murder and one (1)
Virginia,
of
of one
of a
count
use
firearm in the commission of a felony,
sentenced to serve a total of forty
as a result of which he was
years in prison for the
(40)
second degree murder charge and three
(3)
years
in prison for
the
use of a firearm in the commission of a felony charge,
five (25)
The pursuant Rule
with twenty-
years
matter to the of
suspended.
was referred to a United U.S.C. Civil States § Magistrate and Judge (C) , 72 of
provisions
of
28 of
636(b)(l)(B)
72(b)
the Federal
Rules
Procedure
and Rule
the
Rules
of
the
United
States
District
Court
for
the
Eastern
District of Virginia
for report and recommendation.
The report of
the
Magistrate of
Judge
was
filed
on
April
10,
2009
recommending
dismissal
the petition.
By copy of
the report,
each party was
advised of his right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the magistrate
no response from either party.
having reviewed the record, does hereby ADOPT AND
judge.
The Court received
The Court,
APPROVE the findings and recommendations set forth in the report of
the United States Magistrate Judge filed on April 10,
is, therefore,
2009,
and it
ORDERED that the petition be DENIED AND DISMISSED as
the
claims
are
procedurally
that
defaulted
and
without merit.
It
is
further ORDERED
judgment be entered in favor of Respondent.
Petitioner may appeal
from
the
judgment
entered pursuant
to
this
final
order
by
filing
a
written
notice
of
appeal
with
the
Clerk of Norfolk,
this Court,
United States
Courthouse, (30)
600 Granby Street, from the date of
Virginia 23510,
within thirty
days
entry of
such
judgment.
Petitioner has
failed to demonstrate
"a
substantial
Therefore,
of
showing
the Court,
of
the
denial
of
a
constitutional
of
right."
pursuant to Rule 22(b)
declines v. to
the Federal Rules
a certificate U.S. 322, of
Appellate
Procedure, See
issue 537
appealability.
(2003).
Miller-El
Cockrell.
335-36
The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Final Order to Petitioner
and to counsel of record for Respondent.
Mark S. Davis
United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Norfolk,
;
Virginia
2009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?