Ford v. Johnson
Filing
27
FINAL ORDER; the Court does hereby accept the 26 Report and Recommendations; granting 8 Motion to Dismiss; ORDERED that the petition be DENIED and DISMISSED on the basis of petitioner's procedural default in the state courts and on the merits and that judgment be entered in respondent's favor; appeal procedures noted. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 8/25/09. Copy mailed on 8/26/09 (lhow, )
FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Norfolk Division
AUG 2 5 ?^
CLERK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RAYMOND ALEXANDER FORD,
JR.,
#355796,
NORFOLK. VA
Petitioner, v. 2:09CV143
GENE M.
JOHNSON,
Director of the
Virginia Department of Corrections,
Respondent.
FINAL ORDER
This
matter was
initiated by petition
for
a writ
of
habeas
corpus under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254.
The petition alleges violation of federal
rights pertaining to petitioner's convictions on September 13, the Circuit Court of Fairfax County,
the commission of
2005,
in
Virginia,
As
for use of a firearm in
of the conviction,
a malicious wounding.
a result
petitioner was sentenced to serve twenty-two years in the Virginia penal
system.
The matter was
referred to
a United States Magistrate Judge § 636(b)(l)(B)
Court
pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
72 of the Rules of the United States
and
for
(C)
the
and Rule
Eastern
District
District of Virginia for report and recommendation. filed 2009. his report recommending dismissal of the
The Magistrate Judge on August 4,
petition
By copy of the report,
objections to
The
each party was advised of his right to file
findings
has
written
the
Court
and
recommendations
objections to
made
the
by
the
Magistrate Judge.
received no
report,
and the
time
for filing same has expired.
The Court does hereby accept the findings and recommendations
set forth in the report of the United States Magistrate Judge.
Therefore,
it is ORDERED that the petition be DENIED and DISMISSED on the
basis of petitioner's procedural default in the state courts and on the
merits and that judgment be entered in respondent's favor.
Petitioner may appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to
this Final Order by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of this court, United States Courthouse, days from 600 the Granby date Street, of entry Norfolk, of such
Virginia judgment.
23510,
within
thirty
Petitioner has failed to demonstrate "a substantial showing
Therefore, the Court, pursuant
of the denial of a constitutional right."
to Rule 22(b)
of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure,
appealability. See Miller-El v.
declines to
537
issue a certificate of
U.S. 322, 336 (U.S.
Cockrell,
2003).
The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Final Order to petitioner
and to counsel of record for respondent.
/s/ Rebecca Beach Smith
United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Norfolk,
Virginia
2009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?